How Are Rife Manufacturers Compared?

[Matthew Rife]

Wow Jim, your feelings of insecurities are showing with insults like that. I'm busy working but even if I wasn't you wouldn't be able to keep up with what I'm explaining anyway.

[Jim Simmons]

You insulted yourself with that sloppy post I only pointed out the fact that your spelling needs work.
How do you know I can't follow what your explaining when you know nothing about me ?
But lets say your right and I'm just not smart enough to understand what your explaining, so with that in mind can you please explain it for all of the other people on this forum who are much smarter than myself and nearly as smart as you clearly are ?

[Jean Mareche]

Hello
No inflation of the head on the forum. What is needed by everybody is RESULTS not believings. And what is needed is evaluation of the devices. Some of us have PHD's and are professional researchers. As I said, for a pathology, what percentage cured, what percentage better, what percentage no effect, what percentage worse. And do not forget sampling problems due to too small numbers.
Best regards

[Alan Blood]

Hi Matthew,

Two frequencies and no carrier wave ? There are some quotes from historical archives to support that approach. Do the star-shaped antennas operate on that principle ? But surely the emission would be different to a plasma tube fed with two similar frequencies ?

[Jean Mareche]

Hello
Star shaped coils is a slight evolution of the exchangeable coils of the receivers in the early 20's (Rife times). They are known for their excellent quality and high Q, due to low intrinsic capacitance. They are long to produce and so evolved quickly to the honeycomb coil mechanically windable in commercial receivers.
Best regards